chore: cleaning ci steps. #150
@ -9,38 +9,49 @@ import org.junit.Test
|
||||
|
||||
class DatesTest {
|
||||
|
||||
private val v3Date = "2013-04-07T13:43:00+01:00"
|
||||
private val v4Date = "2013-04-07 13:43:00"
|
||||
private val bug1Date = "2022-12-24T17:00:08+00"
|
||||
private val newVersionDateVariant = "2022-12-24T17:00:08+00"
|
||||
private val newVersionDate = "2013-04-07T13:43:00+01:00"
|
||||
private val oldVersionDate = "2013-05-07 13:46:00"
|
||||
private val oldVersionDateVariant = "2021-03-21 10:32:00.000000"
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun v3_date_should_be_parsed() {
|
||||
val date = DateUtils.parseDate(v3Date)
|
||||
val expected =
|
||||
LocalDateTime(2013, 4, 7, 14, 43, 0, 0).toInstant(TimeZone.currentSystemDefault())
|
||||
.toEpochMilliseconds()
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(date, expected)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun v4_date_should_be_parsed() {
|
||||
val date = DateUtils.parseDate(v4Date)
|
||||
fun new_version_date_should_be_parsed() {
|
||||
val date = DateUtils.parseDate(newVersionDate)
|
||||
val expected =
|
||||
LocalDateTime(2013, 4, 7, 13, 43, 0, 0).toInstant(TimeZone.currentSystemDefault())
|
||||
.toEpochMilliseconds()
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(date, expected)
|
||||
assertEquals(expected, date)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun bug1_date_should_be_parsed() {
|
||||
val date = DateUtils.parseDate(bug1Date)
|
||||
fun old_version_date_should_be_parsed() {
|
||||
val date = DateUtils.parseDate(oldVersionDate)
|
||||
val expected =
|
||||
LocalDateTime(2022, 12, 24, 18, 0, 8, 0).toInstant(TimeZone.currentSystemDefault())
|
||||
LocalDateTime(2013, 5, 7, 13, 46, 0, 0).toInstant(TimeZone.currentSystemDefault())
|
||||
.toEpochMilliseconds()
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(date, expected)
|
||||
assertEquals(expected, date)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun old_version_variant_date_should_be_parsed() {
|
||||
val date = DateUtils.parseDate(oldVersionDateVariant)
|
||||
val expected =
|
||||
LocalDateTime(2021, 3, 21, 10, 32, 0, 0).toInstant(TimeZone.currentSystemDefault())
|
||||
.toEpochMilliseconds()
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(expected, date)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun new_version_variant_date_should_be_parsed() {
|
||||
val date = DateUtils.parseDate(newVersionDateVariant)
|
||||
val expected =
|
||||
LocalDateTime(2022, 12, 24, 17, 0, 8, 0).toInstant(TimeZone.currentSystemDefault())
|
||||
.toEpochMilliseconds()
|
||||
|
||||
assertEquals(expected, date)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -6,16 +6,25 @@ import kotlinx.datetime.*
|
||||
|
||||
actual class DateUtils {
|
||||
actual companion object {
|
||||
|
||||
// Possible formats are
|
||||
// yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss format
|
||||
private val oldVersionFormat = "\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2} \\d{2}:\\d{2}:\\d{2}(.()\\d*)?".toRegex()
|
||||
// yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss[.SSS]XXX (RFC3339)
|
||||
private val newVersionFormat = "\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}T\\d{2}:\\d{2}:\\d{2}\\+\\d{2}(:\\d{2})?".toRegex()
|
||||
|
||||
// We may need to consider moving the formatting to platform specific code, even if the tests are doubled
|
||||
// For now, we handle this in a hacky way, because kotlin only accepts iso formats
|
||||
actual fun parseDate(dateString: String): Long {
|
||||
return try {
|
||||
Instant.parse(dateString).toEpochMilliseconds()
|
||||
} catch (e: Exception) {
|
||||
var str = dateString.replace(" ", "T")
|
||||
if (str.matches("\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}T\\d{2}:\\d{2}:\\d{2}\\+\\d{2}".toRegex())) {
|
||||
str = str.split("+")[0]
|
||||
}
|
||||
LocalDateTime.parse(str).toInstant(TimeZone.currentSystemDefault()).toEpochMilliseconds()
|
||||
var isoDateString: String = if (dateString.matches(oldVersionFormat)) {
|
||||
dateString.replace(" ", "T")
|
||||
} else if (dateString.matches(newVersionFormat)) {
|
||||
dateString.split("+")[0]
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
throw Exception("Unrecognized format for $dateString")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return LocalDateTime.parse(isoDateString).toInstant(TimeZone.currentSystemDefault()).toEpochMilliseconds()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
actual fun parseRelativeDate(dateString: String): String {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user